USDA Withdraws Proposed Change to TB, Brucellosis Programs - Drovers Magazine

-

Based on comments received regarding a proposed rule, USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) announced this week it will partially withdraw the proposal. Among other changes, the proposed rule would have consolidated regulations governing bovine tuberculosis and those governing brucellosis. Specifically, APHIS has announced withdrawal of portions of the proposed rule that would have affected provisions governing domestic brucellosis and tuberculosis programs.

Those provisions were included in the proposed rule published December 16, 2015 (18 FR 78462). APHIS solicited comments for 90 days ending on March 15, 2016, and extended the deadline for comments until May 16, 2016. The agency received a total of 164 comments by that date, from captive cervid producers, cervid breeders' associations, cattle industry groups, State agriculture departments, State game and fish departments, veterinarians, representatives of foreign governments, and private citizens. The commenters raised a number and concerns about the proposed rule, including:

  • Commenters were concerned about the proposal to combine the bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis domestic programs into a single program for cattle, bison, and captive cervids, noting differing disease epidemiology, source populations, modes of transmission, surveillance streams, movement controls, testing, and management practices.
  • Commenters expressed concern that states may lack personnel, resources, and funding to implement and maintain required animal-health plans including cattle, bison, and captive cervid demographics, sources of bovine tuberculosis or brucellosis and surveillance and mitigations in the state.
  • The proposal would have based each state’s status on whether it had implemented and maintained its animal-health plan instead of prevalence rates, which commenters said would divert the program from disease eradication and international standards and require foreign trading partners to re-evaluate their requirements for importing U.S. cattle.
  • Many captive cervid producers expressed concern over proposed requirements to test entire herds and individual cervids as a condition of interstate movement, unless they come from accredited herds for brucellosis. Commenters also expressed concerns that, if an area had a known source of tuberculosis and brucellosis that presents a risk, that area could not be accredited or reaccredited.
  • Some commenters objected to a proposal requiring exhibited, rodeo, and event cattle and bison to be tested 60 days prior to initial interstate movement and again at 180 day intervals after initial interstate movement, with limited exceptions. Many State animal health officials and several industry groups objected to considering exhibited cattle and bison equivalent to rodeo and event animals in terms of disease risk, saying exhibited cattle and bison are at low risk for bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis.
  • Wildlife and animal health authorities expressed concern over a proposal that, if a state has known wildlife sources of bovine tuberculosis or brucellosis that pose a risk of transmission, the state would have to conduct surveillance of these source populations. In some states, wildlife authorities lack authority to conduct such testing, while other states lack funds for wildlife testing.

View the proposed rule, supporting documents, and comments AHIS received on this federal regulations website.

For more on bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis, see these articles on BovineVetOnline:

Gene Editing for TB Resistance

Brucellosis Vaccination: Still a Good Idea?

National Academies of Sciences to Outline Brucellosis Research

Managing Brucellosis Risk

 



https://ift.tt/2UidgnJ

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manual on meat inspection for developing countries

-
Image
sinusitis treatment :: Article Creator My 'sinus Infection' Turned Out To Be A One In A Million Nasal Cancer At Just 28 - And Doctors Had To Cut My Eye Out To Save Me By Emily Joshu Health Reporter For Dailymail.Com Published: 06:33 EDT, 20 April 2024Updated: 06:35 EDT, 20 April 2024 A 28 year-old California woman has described the shock of being diagnosed with a deadly sinus cancer that affects fewer than one in a million people - and led to the removal of her right eye. The 'golf ball-sized tumor', which had spread throughout her face, was first mistaken for a sinus infection by the woman's doctors.  Annika, who posts about her condition on TikTok, woke up one morning in 2023 and noticed that the inner corner of her right eye was sore.  While she at first thought nothing of it, by the time the evening rolled around, 'my face started to really, really hurt on the right side,' she said in a video.  The next day, her...
Read more

Rash behind ear: Causes, other symptoms, and treatment - Medical News Today

-
Image
A rash behind the ear may occur due to a variety of different medical conditions. Certain viral infections and autoimmune diseases may cause a rash behind the ear in both children and adults. While some causes, such as contact dermatitis, are not concerning, other causes, including rubella, may be more serious. In this article, we look at some of the causes of a rash behind the ear, as well as the other symptoms that they may produce and how to treat them. Contact dermatitis is an allergic reaction to a particular substance. If an allergy-inducing substance comes into contact with the skin behind the ear, a rash can form. Allergens that may cause contact dermatitis behind the ears include: shampoos soaps other hair care products For example, hair dye products contain an ingredient called paraphenylenediamine (PPD), which is a common contact allergen. Symptoms Contact dermatitis causes itchiness, dryness, and flaking of the skin that came into contact with the allergen. Diagnosis A doc...
Read more

Freddie Mercury's haunting last picture before tragic death from Aids - Irish Mirror

-
Freddie Mercury's final days in 1991 remain enshrined in mystery, nearly 30 years on. The Queen frontman succumbed to his battle with Aids on November 24, having released a public statement just 24 hours previously that confirmed he was HIV+. Rumours had been swirling about his health status for a number of years, with speculation that he had been tested for HIV and Aids as far back as 1986, after his health declined so rapidly that Queen had to halt their 1987 Magic Tour before it was due to finish. Freddie, real name Farrokh Bulsara, had been something of a recluse in his last two years, preferring to stay at his lavish Garden Lodge home in west London's Kensington than rub shoulders with other celebrities at showbiz parties. Tragically, Freddie's health continued to deteriorate in private, as feverish speculation mounted that he was gravely sick. The last known photos of him show how much weight he had lost during his rare public appearances towards the end. On Sep...
Read more